<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do you think of the newly proposed 2013 NASL split season?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/2012/09/10/what-do-you-think-of-the-newly-proposed-2013-nasl-split-season/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/2012/09/10/what-do-you-think-of-the-newly-proposed-2013-nasl-split-season/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-do-you-think-of-the-newly-proposed-2013-nasl-split-season</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:18:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoconutMonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/2012/09/10/what-do-you-think-of-the-newly-proposed-2013-nasl-split-season/#comment-34386</link>
		<dc:creator>CoconutMonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 04:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/?p=36269#comment-34386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strikers:

&quot;Horray we&#039;re half season champs&quot;

Sounds lame when you say it that way, but that&#039;s why I think the league should have followed the Mexican league&#039;s example and kept the Spring and Fall seasons completely separate. The league simply crowns a new champion twice a year. The match between the Apertura and Clausura winner is just Community Shield&#039;ish game to kick off the next season.

It&#039;s foreign for sure, but I still think the idea has promise.

Totally agree with you about the money thing though. A cost cutting plan this is not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strikers:</p>
<p>&#8220;Horray we&#8217;re half season champs&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds lame when you say it that way, but that&#8217;s why I think the league should have followed the Mexican league&#8217;s example and kept the Spring and Fall seasons completely separate. The league simply crowns a new champion twice a year. The match between the Apertura and Clausura winner is just Community Shield&#8217;ish game to kick off the next season.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s foreign for sure, but I still think the idea has promise.</p>
<p>Totally agree with you about the money thing though. A cost cutting plan this is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strikers Return</title>
		<link>http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/2012/09/10/what-do-you-think-of-the-newly-proposed-2013-nasl-split-season/#comment-33473</link>
		<dc:creator>Strikers Return</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/?p=36269#comment-33473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@CoconutMonkey - Actually one of the biggest things about this I find to be &quot;lame&quot; is the idea of two champions within one season. It&#039;s 1000% un-American. Hearing Kartik on Ultras Alive Monday say that they were indeed going to recognize each &quot;half winner&quot; with some sort of trophy or something made me ill. Really? Hooray we&#039;re half season champs! You won&#039;t ever hear me saying that. Feels like a very hollow accomplishment, and the only thing that even somewhat mitigates that feeling is having to win the Soccer Bowl trophy to be the true league champion. If this is going to be forced upon us next year, they at least need to forget about fussing over the &quot;half of a season champions&quot; nonsense and simply call them the two teams that qualified for the championship game.

I can still not find anyone who has come up with even one very specific reason for why this change needed to happen, one that actually holds up to scrutiny. We can all chuck the &quot;cost savings&quot; idea. Besides the fact that you can logically reason out why it wouldn&#039;t be a cost-saver, Kartik flat out said they expect this set up to cost a little more. I think they know that more people than not won&#039;t like it, but they&#039;re counting on us to fall into the attitude of, yeah, I don&#039;t like it, but they&#039;re not going to change it no matter what I say or do, so I&#039;ll just have to learn to live with it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CoconutMonkey &#8211; Actually one of the biggest things about this I find to be &#8220;lame&#8221; is the idea of two champions within one season. It&#8217;s 1000% un-American. Hearing Kartik on Ultras Alive Monday say that they were indeed going to recognize each &#8220;half winner&#8221; with some sort of trophy or something made me ill. Really? Hooray we&#8217;re half season champs! You won&#8217;t ever hear me saying that. Feels like a very hollow accomplishment, and the only thing that even somewhat mitigates that feeling is having to win the Soccer Bowl trophy to be the true league champion. If this is going to be forced upon us next year, they at least need to forget about fussing over the &#8220;half of a season champions&#8221; nonsense and simply call them the two teams that qualified for the championship game.</p>
<p>I can still not find anyone who has come up with even one very specific reason for why this change needed to happen, one that actually holds up to scrutiny. We can all chuck the &#8220;cost savings&#8221; idea. Besides the fact that you can logically reason out why it wouldn&#8217;t be a cost-saver, Kartik flat out said they expect this set up to cost a little more. I think they know that more people than not won&#8217;t like it, but they&#8217;re counting on us to fall into the attitude of, yeah, I don&#8217;t like it, but they&#8217;re not going to change it no matter what I say or do, so I&#8217;ll just have to learn to live with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoconutMonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/2012/09/10/what-do-you-think-of-the-newly-proposed-2013-nasl-split-season/#comment-33286</link>
		<dc:creator>CoconutMonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 06:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/?p=36269#comment-33286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went with undecided.

I like the idea of two compact competitions.  

But to try and tie both competitions together at the end of the season with a one-off final just seems lame to me. Just keep&#039;em separate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went with undecided.</p>
<p>I like the idea of two compact competitions.  </p>
<p>But to try and tie both competitions together at the end of the season with a one-off final just seems lame to me. Just keep&#8217;em separate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/2012/09/10/what-do-you-think-of-the-newly-proposed-2013-nasl-split-season/#comment-33136</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/?p=36269#comment-33136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@leper

Great analysis!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@leper</p>
<p>Great analysis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leper</title>
		<link>http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/2012/09/10/what-do-you-think-of-the-newly-proposed-2013-nasl-split-season/#comment-33047</link>
		<dc:creator>leper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/?p=36269#comment-33047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think there&#039;s one team might be expecting to make money off of friendlies during this month off next year.  If the Cosmos truly have their act together (a point on which I&#039;m personally skeptical, but we&#039;ll see), and their brand is as well-known and respected around the world as they claim, I can see them getting some of the big name European teams that play against MLS sides on their pre-season tours to play them as well.  And I can see that making money if done right.  Lots of ifs, but it&#039;s at least feasible.  For everybody else, it seems a lot less likely.

Overall, I have to agree with the sentiment that this was a solution in search of a problem.  I guess it doesn&#039;t bother me that much in general, since it&#039;s likely not signigicantly better or worse for me or the team I follow.  But I don&#039;t really see where it&#039;s a big improvement.  If the playoff costs are the issue, why not just keep the schedule the same as it is now, but reduce the nuber of teams in the playoffs.

Also, I fail to see how this improves alignment with the &quot;world calendar&quot; or &quot;fifa schedule&quot; or whatever misleading thing you want to call it.  Can people just get over the idea that everyone else in the world outside the US follows the same schedule and  we don&#039;t just because we&#039;re goofy.  But that&#039;s not remotely accurate, and there is nothing even approaching one standard calendar.  Plus, if the NASL keeps this in place for a second year in 2014 and plays their spring season up through July 4th, they&#039;ll end up playing right through (and competing for the attention of fans with) most of some kind of tournament thing I hear they&#039;re playing down in Brazil that year from mid-June through Mid-July.  If you&#039;re concerned about international calendar alignments, wouldn&#039;t that be the biggest event on the international calendar?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s one team might be expecting to make money off of friendlies during this month off next year.  If the Cosmos truly have their act together (a point on which I&#8217;m personally skeptical, but we&#8217;ll see), and their brand is as well-known and respected around the world as they claim, I can see them getting some of the big name European teams that play against MLS sides on their pre-season tours to play them as well.  And I can see that making money if done right.  Lots of ifs, but it&#8217;s at least feasible.  For everybody else, it seems a lot less likely.</p>
<p>Overall, I have to agree with the sentiment that this was a solution in search of a problem.  I guess it doesn&#8217;t bother me that much in general, since it&#8217;s likely not signigicantly better or worse for me or the team I follow.  But I don&#8217;t really see where it&#8217;s a big improvement.  If the playoff costs are the issue, why not just keep the schedule the same as it is now, but reduce the nuber of teams in the playoffs.</p>
<p>Also, I fail to see how this improves alignment with the &#8220;world calendar&#8221; or &#8220;fifa schedule&#8221; or whatever misleading thing you want to call it.  Can people just get over the idea that everyone else in the world outside the US follows the same schedule and  we don&#8217;t just because we&#8217;re goofy.  But that&#8217;s not remotely accurate, and there is nothing even approaching one standard calendar.  Plus, if the NASL keeps this in place for a second year in 2014 and plays their spring season up through July 4th, they&#8217;ll end up playing right through (and competing for the attention of fans with) most of some kind of tournament thing I hear they&#8217;re playing down in Brazil that year from mid-June through Mid-July.  If you&#8217;re concerned about international calendar alignments, wouldn&#8217;t that be the biggest event on the international calendar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jspech</title>
		<link>http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/2012/09/10/what-do-you-think-of-the-newly-proposed-2013-nasl-split-season/#comment-32914</link>
		<dc:creator>jspech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/?p=36269#comment-32914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Split season, single table, no playoffs. If playoffs are a must- then  1 v.2 (single game- Soccer Bowl)

break give teams time to retool

imagine if the last place team goes on an unbeaten run. What excitement. NASL will tweak it. But I give em points for courage. Out of site out of mind]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Split season, single table, no playoffs. If playoffs are a must- then  1 v.2 (single game- Soccer Bowl)</p>
<p>break give teams time to retool</p>
<p>imagine if the last place team goes on an unbeaten run. What excitement. NASL will tweak it. But I give em points for courage. Out of site out of mind</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/2012/09/10/what-do-you-think-of-the-newly-proposed-2013-nasl-split-season/#comment-32909</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/?p=36269#comment-32909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@BQ

I think your voting analysis is similar to this year&#039;s Presidential elections.  The polls state that it is close (much like the 3,200 views that may show interest to the site), but only 125 folks voted, much like this will be in the November ballot session, largely due to non-interest at the college youth level.

This site is quickly becoming the politial forefront for forecasts on all topics!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BQ</p>
<p>I think your voting analysis is similar to this year&#8217;s Presidential elections.  The polls state that it is close (much like the 3,200 views that may show interest to the site), but only 125 folks voted, much like this will be in the November ballot session, largely due to non-interest at the college youth level.</p>
<p>This site is quickly becoming the politial forefront for forecasts on all topics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the away fan</title>
		<link>http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/2012/09/10/what-do-you-think-of-the-newly-proposed-2013-nasl-split-season/#comment-32893</link>
		<dc:creator>the away fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/?p=36269#comment-32893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the change in that it&#039;s different than the tired playoff format of every other American sport.  Do I think it&#039;s great? No, I&#039;d rather have seen a single table format.  So while I&#039;m in favor of the change, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s &#039;great&#039; but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s bad either.  So, maybe that&#039;s a strained way of saying undecided.  I favor the new format--maybe I&#039;m too hung up on the wording.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the change in that it&#8217;s different than the tired playoff format of every other American sport.  Do I think it&#8217;s great? No, I&#8217;d rather have seen a single table format.  So while I&#8217;m in favor of the change, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s &#8216;great&#8217; but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s bad either.  So, maybe that&#8217;s a strained way of saying undecided.  I favor the new format&#8211;maybe I&#8217;m too hung up on the wording.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Quarstad</title>
		<link>http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/2012/09/10/what-do-you-think-of-the-newly-proposed-2013-nasl-split-season/#comment-32889</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Quarstad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/?p=36269#comment-32889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So isn&#039;t that undecided?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So isn&#8217;t that undecided?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the away fan</title>
		<link>http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/2012/09/10/what-do-you-think-of-the-newly-proposed-2013-nasl-split-season/#comment-32886</link>
		<dc:creator>the away fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/?p=36269#comment-32886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@BQ  I didn&#039;t vote because none of the options fit my opinion on the issue.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a bad idea, but I don&#039; think it&#039;s a &#039;great&#039; idea either.  I am hopeful it will work out for the clubs.  Personally, I like watching a match in cooler weather, so the early start and later end doesn&#039;t bother me and I don&#039;t mind putting on a sweatshirt to watch a match.  Maybe nothing needed to be fixed, but after watching an extremely dull match on Saturday at the NSC, I don&#039;t think having playoffs makes the matches more exciting and if it saves costs, that&#039;s a good thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BQ  I didn&#8217;t vote because none of the options fit my opinion on the issue.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a bad idea, but I don&#8217; think it&#8217;s a &#8216;great&#8217; idea either.  I am hopeful it will work out for the clubs.  Personally, I like watching a match in cooler weather, so the early start and later end doesn&#8217;t bother me and I don&#8217;t mind putting on a sweatshirt to watch a match.  Maybe nothing needed to be fixed, but after watching an extremely dull match on Saturday at the NSC, I don&#8217;t think having playoffs makes the matches more exciting and if it saves costs, that&#8217;s a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
